On Thu, Jan 20, 2000, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > babinebell> I think we should seperate the functions handling values > babinebell> and the functions handling callbacks: > babinebell> > babinebell> int BIO_ctrl_callback(BIO *bp,int cmd,long larg,int (*cb)()); > Hmm, actually, I like that alternative. That allows us to go around > the whole union/pass-by-value/and-so-on brouhaha... :-) Looks ok. Will you implement it? ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compile... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C com... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C com... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C com... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C com... Geoff Thorpe
- Re: Sadistic C com... Goetz Babin-Ebell
- Re: Sadistic C com... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C com... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Sadistic C com... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Sadistic C com... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Ben Laurie
- RE: Sadistic C compiler... Salz, Rich
- RE: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- RE: Sadistic C compiler... Jeffrey Altman
- RE: Sadistic C compiler... Salz, Rich
- RE: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker