> appro> Why not simply relax the compiler with /STANDARD=RELAXED or whatever:-) > > Sure, we can do that. Is that the right thing to do? ":-)" was actually ment to designate the wrong thing. > > We need to decide if this is something that actually warrants our > attention, or if we think it can be safely ignored. My vote is "it should be fixed, eventually." Andy. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compile... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C com... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C com... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Ben Laurie
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Dr Stephen Henson
- Re: Sadistic C compile... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C com... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Dr Stephen Henson
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Bodo Moeller
