Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/bn bn_lib.c bn_shift.c bntest.cexpspeed.c

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

From: Bodo Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

moeller> So should we delete the superfluous zeroing from those functions that
moeller> currently do it theirselves, or should we remove zeroing from the
moeller> expand function and move it to those functions that need it and don't
moeller> do it?  It's not just wasted cycles, also it's confusing to those
moeller> who try to read the source code.

I'd prefer to have it in one central place than duplicated all over
the place, so I think that zeroing code should be removed from the
callers when and if present...

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken   \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken   \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]