Geoff Thorpe wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > ; gcc -c -ansi -pedantic a.c
> > a.c:3: warning: ANSI C does not allow extra `;' outside of a function
>
> :-) OK, I'm busted. hehe.
>
> Fair enough, I guess ANSI is as good a reason as any! I'll remove any
> other trailing semi-colons in the next bunch of lhash-related commits.
>
I think the DECLARE and IMPLEMENT macros for most things don't have a
semicolon anyway so it would be an idea to follow that for consistency.
If you really want the semicolon then I suppose you could just include a
superfluous prototype for one of the functions just declared without the
semicolon.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior crypto engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Core developer of the OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/
Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: via homepage.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
