From: Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rsalz> I remember back when it was SSLeay and I had some folks at OSF, and then rsalz> later on at CertCo, asking that the NO_* macros only disable the rsalz> implementation, not the data structures. This was one of the reasons rsalz> why. Actually, I see no reason why one should leave the data structures around... -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Binary incompatability caused by different compiler flags
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Fri, 02 Mar 2001 05:11:42 -0800
- Binary incompatability caused by different c... Damien Miller
- Re: Binary incompatability caused by di... Dr S N Henson
- Re: Binary incompatability caused by di... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Binary incompatability caused b... Nalin Dahyabhai
- Re: Binary incompatability caused by di... Rich Salz
- Re: Binary incompatability caused by di... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Binary incompatability caused by di... Rich Salz
- Re: Binary incompatability caused by di... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Binary incompatability caused b... Rich Salz
