From: Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Binary incompatability caused by different compiler flags
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 10:00:11 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

rsalz> > Actually, I see no reason why one should leave the data structures
rsalz> > around...
rsalz> 
rsalz> Do you mean "should not" ?

Uh, yes...

rsalz> One reason for removing them is that it makes it very easy to see if you
rsalz> accidentally included implementation code -- it will fail to compile.

You mean where external application fiddle in the structures
themselves?  That brings on a personal wish: hidden structures.  I'd
very much like to use that, so we could avoid exactly that kind of
fiddling...

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken   \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken   \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to