From: Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Lutz.Jaenicke> Hmm. The DSO code was considerably changed for the
Lutz.Jaenicke> 0.9.7 version and changes are not completed yet
Lutz.Jaenicke> (additional security aspects must be considered with
Lutz.Jaenicke> respect to the search path).
Lutz.Jaenicke> The 0.9.6a is only intended to fix bugs and especially
Lutz.Jaenicke> should not break existing functionality, therefore
Lutz.Jaenicke> you'll have to wait for 0.9.7 for the improved DSO
Lutz.Jaenicke> handling.

On this particular point, it shouldn't be too hard to integrate change
1.11 of dso_dl.c, and that would hardly break existing functionality,
and at least make OpenSSL operate in a consistent way over all Unixly
platforms (since it doesn't prohibit the use of LD_LIBRARY_PATH on all
other platforms).

Thoughts?

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken   \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken   \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to