Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta 1 released

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

From: Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Lutz.Jaenicke> 1.10 breaks existing functionality, since once ".sl" is
Lutz.Jaenicke> used, ".so" crypto engines will not be loaded any
Lutz.Jaenicke> longer (and they were loaded with 0.9.6 as ".so").

But since shared libraries on HP-UX are normally named libfoo.sl (as
it is for libswift and ncipher!), wouldn't requiring libfoo.so be
considered a bug?  It feels like users of OpenSSL have to go to
unnecessary lengths to get it working...

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken   \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken   \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]