[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> levitte     29-Mar-2001 09:45:09
> 
>   Modified:    crypto/des Tag: OpenSSL_0_9_6-stable xcbc_enc.c speed.c
>                         pcbc_enc.c ofb_enc.c ofb64enc.c ncbc_enc.c
>                         ede_cbcm_enc.c ecb_enc.c des_opts.c des_enc.c des.h
>                         cfb_enc.c cfb64enc.c cbc_cksm.c
>                .        Tag: OpenSSL_0_9_6-stable CHANGES
>   Log:
>   Since there has been reports of clashes between OpenSSL's
>   des_encrypt() and des_encrypt() defined on some systems (Solaris and
>   Unixware and maybe others), we rename des_encrypt() to des_encrypt1().
>   This should have very little impact on external software unless
>   someone has written a mode of DES, since that's all des_encrypt() is
>   meant for.

I think OPENSSL_des_encrypt would have been a better choice...

By

Goetz

-- 
Goetz Babin-Ebell, TC TrustCenter GmbH, http://www.trustcenter.de
Sonninstr. 24-28, 20097 Hamburg, Germany
Tel.: +49-(0)40 80 80 26 -0,  Fax: +49-(0)40 80 80 26 -126
Visit us at CeBIT 2001 in  Hall 06, booth C40

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to