> The problem with that idea is it is incompatible with all the other
> functions in OpenSSL. The functions that clash in Kerberos are all
> (there aren't many) static, so there aren't actually many ramifications
> to changing them in Kerberos.
Are you saying that if I want to install openssl on a Kerberos-enabled
host, I will now have to edit and recompile by Kerberos sources? If so,
I think that it an unacceptable barrier to openssl deployment,
particularly when the primary counter-argument is "we don't like the
function names we'd use" :)
/r$
--
Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures,
Encryption)
http://www.zolera.com
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
