Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > > From: Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ben> Bodo Moeller wrote: > ben> > > ben> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 12:32:56PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > ben> > > ben> > >> If they are static in Kerberos, how can there be a name clash? > ben> > >> Unless whatever Kerberos package you're talking about uses > ben> > >> "#include <openssl/des.h>", in which case it wouldn't need its own > ben> > >> variants of that stuff. > ben> > > ben> > > In Heimdal, they are not declared in the exported header files, but > ben> > > they are still present in the static library files. We have similar > ben> > > functions in OpenSSL... > ben> > > ben> > OK, so they are not actually 'static', just hidden. Then we should > ben> > try and find new names for those OpenSSL functions that would > ben> > conflict. What is the complete list? > ben> > ben> The ones I was referring to actually are static. > > Then they should not be a problem, and definitely not a source of > clashing, should they?
Yes, because they conflict with the included headers! Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]