Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> 
> From: Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> ben> Bodo Moeller wrote:
> ben> >
> ben> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 12:32:56PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> ben> >
> ben> > >> If they are static in Kerberos, how can there be a name clash?
> ben> > >> Unless whatever Kerberos package you're talking about uses
> ben> > >> "#include <openssl/des.h>", in which case it wouldn't need its own
> ben> > >> variants of that stuff.
> ben> >
> ben> > > In Heimdal, they are not declared in the exported header files, but
> ben> > > they are still present in the static library files.  We have similar
> ben> > > functions in OpenSSL...
> ben> >
> ben> > OK, so they are not actually 'static', just hidden.  Then we should
> ben> > try and find new names for those OpenSSL functions that would
> ben> > conflict.  What is the complete list?
> ben>
> ben> The ones I was referring to actually are static.
> 
> Then they should not be a problem, and definitely not a source of
> clashing, should they?

Yes, because they conflict with the included headers!

Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to