On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:55:28PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > From: Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > peb> If, on the other hand, the libraries from 0.9.6a and 0.9.6c are > peb> binary compatible they certainly deserve the same soname, but > peb> then ssh shouln't be able to notice the difference. > > They are binary compatible. I suggest you look in the openssh source > to see how it detects the version, and yes, it's a bit oversensitive.
Does the CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS increment (and renumbering of CRYPTO_LOCK_*) break binary compatibility? I see mod_ssl is allocating a static array sized by CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS... not sure if this is common practice. joe ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
