From: Massimiliano Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
madwolf> I have not followed the discussion from the beginning, but have you
madwolf> considered supporting BerkeleyDB ? We have, for our project, two
madwolf> different modules one supporting SQL DBMS and the other using
madwolf> BerkeleyDB as backend (one can choose what he likes best for his
madwolf> own system). I suggest you to fist implement the simplest (for
madwolf> the user point of view) that, to me, is the BerkeleyDB (or similar,
madwolf> we use this because it is fast, reliable and os... ) and then
madwolf> add support for SQL DBMS (more complex to administrate).
The subject is misleading. We concluded some time ago that the
database type is irrelevant, it's just a matter of having an
appropriate plugin. What's discussed here is basically what the
OpenSSL framework (i.e., one layer or two above the actual database
calls). should/would/could look like.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
