In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 Apr 
2002 22:20:53 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

dkaufman> > gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_CYGWIN32 
-DOPENSSL_THREADS  -DDSO_WIN32 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 
-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 -Wall   -c -o e_bf.o e_bf.c
dkaufman> > make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../../include/openssl/idea.h', needed 
by `e_idea.o'.  Stop.
dkaufman> > make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/d/CYGWIN/ssl097-0419/openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020419/crypto/evp'
dkaufman> > make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 1
dkaufman> > make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/d/CYGWIN/ssl097-0419/openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020419/crypto'
dkaufman> > make: *** [sub_all] Error 1
dkaufman> 
dkaufman> This problem can be fixed by running "make depend".

Not just "can be fixed".  That is what you have to do when you have
changed the configuration, period.

dkaufman> After running "make depend", the next error is due to lack
dkaufman> of "bn_sub_part_words". This was addressed in my patch for
dkaufman> both DJGPP and Cygwin. 

Ah, so that's what that is about.

Tell me something, do you get those same errors when you configure
without excluding any algorithm (basically, just a plain "./config")?
If not, it might be worth looking into what gets different with the
exclusions...

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to