Can I assume that sed exists and works properly?  dirname can be 
coded like this:

   echo $$i | sed -e 's|[^/]*$||' -e 's|/$||'

If that's guaranteed to work everywhere, that seems to be a good 
candidate for a 'dirname $$i' replacement...

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun  5 10:53:14 2002]:

> To follow up, I compiled a small dirname from the ucLinux project, 
and
> while that operates correctly, these man pages would not install. 
In the
> end I just ended up commenting out the Perl manual stuff and 
installing it
> by hand. The rest of the make install process completes 
successfully.
> 
> Please, lets keep NeXTSTEP/OpenStep support in OpenSSL.  I know 
that some
> other projects (such as GCC) are considering dropping NeXT support 
as an
> obsolete architecture, along with alot of other systems, like m68k 
and PDP.
> 
> > making all in tools...
> > installing man1/CA.pl.1
> > sh: dirname: not found
> > *** Exit 1
> >
> > NeXTSTEP and OpenStep include the basename utility, but not the
> > dirname utility.  Is there some sort of pre-existing workaround 
or is
> > there an implmentation of dirname available in one of the GNU 
packages?


-- 
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to