On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 13 08:34:54 2002]: > > > The "config" script needs to use "gcc -dumpversion" > > instead of "gcc --version" to determine the gcc version. > > gcc-3.1 outputs a bunch of text with "--version", but > > just the number with "-dumpversion", which also works for > > gcc-2.95. > > Sounds like a possible solution to the problem of gcc version > recognition. The solution being included currently doesn't seem to be > sufficient (see thread "Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1", > I have added [EMAIL PROTECTED] as another requestor for this > ticket). > > For how long this flag has been supported? I suppose it will work on > CYGWIN as well.
Goes back to at least 1994 ... tim(trr)@asv 4% gcc -dumpversion 2.6.3 ... > > Best regards, > Lutz > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 887-1469 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
