Dear Richard and the OpenSSL team,
I am very sorry for this delay. We have now got our legal review and approval of the export license. We will be ready now to submit our changes to OpenSSL organization to get it reviewed and approved. We would like to use OpenSSL name to our port because we have not made any functional changes to the product. Our OpenSSL 0.9.6 port is a clean port. We would like to send our changes to you and cc the [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Our legal just told us that these two addresses are not valid U.S. government addresses. I am enclosing the correspondence as it is for you to see. Could you please let me know who we should "cc" in our correspondence to you? Please advise me here. " checked with Barry, and neither of those email addresses are valid U.S. government addresses; thus we should not be sending code to either address. I would contact the person at OpenSSL to get further clarification on this issue. Elaine A. Martel, Esq. U.S. Registered Patent Attorney Senior Counsel & Asst. Secretary Stratus Technologies, Inc. 111 Powdermill Road Maynard, MA 01754 U.S.A. Tel (978) 461-7331 Fax (978) 461-3690 Mobile (508) 733-7927 " Thank you, Bose -----Original Message----- From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 12:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Stratus OpenSSL diffs and test results. A few comments: - Since you're based in the US, you MUST cc: any patch to OpenSSL to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferably, because that address is publically archived) or [EMAIL PROTECTED] The cc: MUST be visible for us, or we (the OpenSSL team) will not permit ourselves to even look at the patch (to protect OpenSSL against possible future legal action). - Please generate context diffs, perferably unified ones. The flag to generate the older context diff format is -c, and for unified diff format it's -u (available at least with GNU diff). With context diffs, it's actually possible to apply your patches to other versions of OpenSSL without doing too much guesswork. - IT IS NOT OK for you to try to take copyright on the maurice demo code, especially when the changes are so very small. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
