Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
>>We will probably not apply your change to the 0.9.6 line of
>>development, because it's a rather big change, and we try to avoid
>>that within the same line of development (for now, 0.9.x is a line of
>>development, so 0.9.7 is a different one, as is 0.9.8 (in development
>>right now, and where most if the bleeding edge hacking is done)). We
>>will definitely take a closer look at your patch for 0.9.7 and 0.9.8.
>
> Anymore news about this issue? Meaning: are there anymore missing
> prototypes in the 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 trees, respectively?
> I have tagged this ticket with the 0.9.7 keyword to be kept in mind.
> If no more prototypes are missing in 0.9.7, this ticket should be
> closed.
Hi, thanks for checking back on this. I'm just using whatever is in
FreeBSD, which currently is still at version 0.9.6g, so I can't easily
test 0.9.7 or 0.9.8.
However, my particular problem is very simple to duplicate. Just do this:
$ echo "#include <openssl/ssl.h>" > xx.c
$ cc -Wstrict-prototypes xx.c
In file included from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:116,
from xx.c:1:
/usr/include/openssl/comp.h:15: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
/usr/include/openssl/comp.h:16: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
/usr/include/openssl/comp.h:17: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
/usr/include/openssl/comp.h:18: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
/usr/include/openssl/comp.h:19: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
/usr/include/openssl/comp.h:20: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
...etc etc...
Cheers,
-Archie
__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * Packet Design * http://www.packetdesign.com
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
