In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:00:41 +0100, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> Well, *if* this is supposed to be the last beta, then the only question
appro> is if we *dare* to merge the code directly into the final version, i.e.
appro> without exposing it in beta. I consider that we can dare to do so as
appro> long as SuSE Labs promise that they would double-check couple of
appro> snapshots upon explicit request. Peter?
Well, to be perfectly honest, we can't say in advance if a beta is
going to be final or not. We can only say that we hope it is or
expect it to be. For that reason, I'd prefer things like that to go
in *now*, so they have a chance for exposure.
The other option is to have it wait until 0.9.7a...
Your call.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
