> appro> Well, *if* this is supposed to be the last beta, then the only question > appro> is if we *dare* to merge the code directly into the final version, i.e. > appro> without exposing it in beta. I consider that we can dare to do so as > appro> long as SuSE Labs promise that they would double-check couple of > appro> snapshots upon explicit request. Peter? > > Well, to be perfectly honest, we can't say in advance if a beta is > going to be final or not. We can only say that we hope it is or > expect it to be. For that reason, I'd prefer things like that to go > in *now*, so they have a chance for exposure. > > The other option is to have it wait until 0.9.7a... > > Your call.
If it's up to me, then I already answered. To roll out x86_64 accelerated support is trivial. But I think it's more important to expose DES PIC code so I'd wait till it's committed. At least till the weekend or so... A. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]