> appro> Well, *if* this is supposed to be the last beta, then the only question
> appro> is if we *dare* to merge the code directly into the final version, i.e.
> appro> without exposing it in beta. I consider that we can dare to do so as
> appro> long as SuSE Labs promise that they would double-check couple of
> appro> snapshots upon explicit request. Peter?
> 
> Well, to be perfectly honest, we can't say in advance if a beta is
> going to be final or not.  We can only say that we hope it is or
> expect it to be.  For that reason, I'd prefer things like that to go
> in *now*, so they have a chance for exposure.
> 
> The other option is to have it wait until 0.9.7a...
> 
> Your call.

If it's up to me, then I already answered. To roll out x86_64
accelerated support is trivial. But I think it's more important to
expose DES PIC code so I'd wait till it's committed. At least till the
weekend or so... A.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to