In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:39:35 +0100, Andy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> So that if nobody can decline the above paragraph, then the only appro> question that is left is if anybody can verify that proposed patch appro> doesn't actually break Windows build. Or should I just let the code appro> appear in a snapshot? Commit it and let people test snapshots. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]