In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:12:24 +0100, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> > dkaufman> I noticed that the makefile contains a special line for
appro> > dkaufman> DJGPP, similar to the one for Cygwin. This isn't needed for
appro> > dkaufman> DJGPP. Patch attached.
appro> >
appro> > Please explain why .dll loading would be different in that particular
appro> > case...
appro>
appro> Because loading of Windows .dll is not an option in DJGPP? Isn't DJGPP
appro> so to say all own OS? At least it doesn't rely upon WIN32 API, but
appro> MS-DOS "int 21h" and *if* it supports some kind of dynamicaly loadable
appro> objects, it has nothing to do with Windows LoadLibrary call, the one
appro> using %PATH% to look for .dlls. A.
Ah. Then why did we litter the Makefiles with tests of DJGPP, and why
whould only the one Doug mentioned be removed?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
