In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:49:31
+0100 (MET), "Stephen Henson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> I've analysed this further and the cause seems to be that it bcc 5.5
rt> complains about taking the address of a structure that doesn't have a
rt> complete definition.
rt>
rt> For example the following wont compile:
rt>
rt> typedef struct FOO_st FOO;
rt>
rt> extern FOO bar;
rt>
rt> FOO *pbar;
rt>
rt> pbar = &bar;
rt>
rt> but it has no problems on other compilers.
I believe this is a compiler bug, which should be reported back to
Borland (unless they have a newer version of bcc that works
correctly).
rt> If you add EXPORT_VAR_AS_FN in the BCC-32 entry in Configure as in the
rt> VC-WIN32 entry it seems to compile OK and passes all the tests.
rt>
rt> I'll check in this fix soon.
Sounds reasonable.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
