In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:49:31 +0100 (MET), "Stephen Henson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> I've analysed this further and the cause seems to be that it bcc 5.5 rt> complains about taking the address of a structure that doesn't have a rt> complete definition. rt> rt> For example the following wont compile: rt> rt> typedef struct FOO_st FOO; rt> rt> extern FOO bar; rt> rt> FOO *pbar; rt> rt> pbar = &bar; rt> rt> but it has no problems on other compilers. I believe this is a compiler bug, which should be reported back to Borland (unless they have a newer version of bcc that works correctly). rt> If you add EXPORT_VAR_AS_FN in the BCC-32 entry in Configure as in the rt> VC-WIN32 entry it seems to compile OK and passes all the tests. rt> rt> I'll check in this fix soon. Sounds reasonable. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]