Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:49:31 +0100 (MET), "Stephen Henson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> I've analysed this further and the cause seems to be that it bcc 5.5
rt> complains about taking the address of a structure that doesn't have a
rt> complete definition.
rt> rt> For example the following wont compile:
rt> rt> typedef struct FOO_st FOO;
rt> rt> extern FOO bar;
rt> rt> FOO *pbar;
rt> rt> pbar = &bar;
rt> rt> but it has no problems on other compilers.
I believe this is a compiler bug, which should be reported back to
Borland (unless they have a newer version of bcc that works
correctly).
It is a compiler bug, definitely.
Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
