In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 4 Jul 2003 00:12:24 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
groups> The problem is the following, yes your code (ERR_pop_to_mark/ERR_set_mark) groups> is fine when a child function is adding a new error, however, what happends groups> when it calls ERR_clear_error ? In my implementation I need the error stack groups> to be preserved even if a child function calls ERR_clear_error. groups> groups> That's why if you happended to remove the "if (!err_fns)" test in groups> ERR_set_implementation, I would be more than happy. I'm sorry, but in what way does that prevent the error stack to be cleared? Maybe a better thing would be to have a flag that inhibits clearing the error stack... I'll ponder over this issue. -- Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 3 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]