In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 4 Jul 2003 00:12:24 +0200, Fr�d�ric Giudicelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
groups> The problem is the following, yes your code (ERR_pop_to_mark/ERR_set_mark)
groups> is fine when a child function is adding a new error, however, what happends
groups> when it calls ERR_clear_error ? In my implementation I need the error stack
groups> to be preserved even if a child function calls ERR_clear_error.
groups>
groups> That's why if you happended to remove the "if (!err_fns)" test in
groups> ERR_set_implementation, I would be more than happy.
I'm sorry, but in what way does that prevent the error stack to be
cleared? Maybe a better thing would be to have a flag that inhibits
clearing the error stack... I'll ponder over this issue.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsv�gen 3 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
