On March 25, 2004 10:44 am, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > To begin with, I think the correct interpretation is that the output > buffer is required to have the same size as the modulus, so logically, > an output size parameter isn't required except for checking purposes.
Well yes, my point had been that the output size is the only size parameter in the prototype. That's perhaps indicative of the state of affaires. :-) > I guess that allowing an input size that's smaller than the modulus > size could be doable, but isn't adviceable for security reasons or > something like that... Well it could all be handled relative to the padding parameters, the issue again is that the API isn't exposed in this form and changing it involves ... well, you know very well what that involves. <shudder> I think this is just one of those things that doesn't warrant us messing with it right now - if someone cares enough, they could clarify the relevant docs. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
