In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 24 May 2005 23:16:11 -0400, Geoff Thorpe 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

geoff> Richard, any idea of how safe it would be to change the names
geoff> of the two shared librariesy at this stage of the 0.9.8 betas?
geoff> I'm reluctant to charge ahead for fear of breaking the strange
geoff> builds (win32, VMS, cygwin, ...)

(I'll join Corinna in saying "What?  VMS a strange build?  How dare
you... ;-)")

I have no problems with a name change of the sort.  In the VMS case, I
doubt anyone will mind :-).

geoff> Oh that reminds me too - the build I tried earlier got a
geoff> duplicate symbol in libcrypto and so "make install" ended up
geoff> without the shared-library version of libcrypto installed -
geoff> everything seemed to work anyway (presumably everything linked
geoff> to libcrypto.a instead) so this goes unnoticed quite easily.
geoff> I'll try to dig up more info tomorrow when I get back to the
geoff> machine I was on. 

Does that happen with a clean working directory?

Cheers,
Richard

-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
 the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
                                                -- C.S. Lewis
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [email protected]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to