My configure script
./Configure shared debug \
--prefix=/usr \
--openssldir=/usr/share/ssl \
linux-ppc
no longer works on 0.9.8
David
On 7/6/05, David Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I build a debug version of 0.9.8?
>
> David
>
> On 7/5/05, Andy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Okay, having actually did what Andy suggested, i.e. the one liner fix
> > > in the assembly code, bn_div_words returns the correct results.
> >
> > Note that the final version, one committed to all relevant OpenSSL
> > branches since couple of days ago and one which actually made to just
> > released 0.9.8, is a bit different from originally suggested one-line
> > fix, see for example http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=14199.
> >
> > > At this point, my conclusion is, up to openssl-0.9.8-beta6, the ppc32
> > > bn_div_words routine generated from crypto/bn/ppc.pl is still busted.
> >
> > Yes. Though it should be noted that 0.9.8 was inadvertently avoiding the
> > bug condition. Recall that original problem report was for 0.9.7.
> >
> > > Why do you signal an overflow condition when it appears functions that
> > > call bn_div_words do not check for overflow conditions?
> >
> > That's question to IBM. By the time they submitted the code, I've
> > explicitly asked what would be appropriate way to generate *fatal*
> > condition at that point, i.e. one which would result in a core dump, and
> > it came out as division by 0 instruction. By that time I had no access
> > to any PPC machine and had to just go with it. Now it actually came as
> > surprise that division by 0 does not raise an exception, but silently
> > returns implementation-specific value... A.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
> >
>
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
