Attached are the two additional requirements, as specified by Jeffrey Altman.
Thanks, --Ivan > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of OpenSSL-Bugs > Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 3:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [openssl.org #1401] AutoReply: Proxy module > > > Greetings, > This message has been automatically generated in > response to the creation of a trouble ticket regarding: > "Proxy module", > a summary of which appears below. > > There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your > ticket has been assigned an ID of [openssl.org #1401]. > > Please include the string: > > [openssl.org #1401] > > in the subject line of all future correspondence about this > issue. To do so, you may reply to this message. > > Also, please note that all attachments to your message have > been stored in the database, but are not included in any > outgoing mail. > > Thank you, > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > > Hi, > > I'm submitting this patch as suggested below. This patch adds > the x509_proxy module to openssl which can create and > printout proxy certificates. > > I don't know if the licensing in the patch adheres to OpenSSL > requirements, If there are any problems please email me and > I'll figure out how to modify it appropriately. > > Thank you, > > --Ivan > > PS -- the command used to create this (from two cvs trees) was: > > diff -u -N -r -x CVS -x certs clean proxy, so it can be > applied to a clean cvs tree with: > > (from within the checked out dir) patch -p1 -u < patchfile. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton > > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 1:40 PM > > To: openssl-dev@openssl.org > > Subject: Re: Proxy module > > > > First off, you need to get rid of the "all rights reserved" > > copyright clause. Changing it so that it states you grant > usage and > > distribution rights with OpenSSL under its license would be a good > > start. (Licensing, licensing, we all have to worry about it. :( ) > > > > Next, create a diff -c (contextual diff) against the current CVS, > > including changes to the makefiles. > > > > Then, submit that diff as a patch against the current CVS to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > (At least this is how I presume things should be done. This module > > may need to go into the contrib/ directory, as it does affect > > validation and thus security.) > > > > -Kyle H > > > > On 9/29/06, Ivan R. Judson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Awhile ago I mentioned wanting to get proxy support (RFC > 3280, yes > > > it's expired, but in use) into openssl as simply as possible. > > > > > > I've built the attached module, that does what I wanted. > What's the > > > best way to try and get this integrated into the standard > > distribution? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > --Ivan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -Kyle H > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > OpenSSL Project > http://www.openssl.org > > Development Mailing List > openssl-dev@openssl.org > > Automated List Manager > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
