On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Richard Salz wrote: > Wait for both, keep your own state. Works well enough. See the products > at the URL in my .sig for proof :)
Wow! That *really* impressed me. So, besides throwing titles and sigs, can you show how easily can you cope with the current SSL_shutdown() behaviour when combined to non-blocking BIOs? Please? > The current API works. "Better" is not a reason to change it. Current SSL_shutdown() API works flawlessly with blocking BIOs. Please show the magic you have to do to make it work with non-blocking BIOs. You know what? Knowing the product you're going so proud of in your sigs, being a one-billion-threads design, I even doubt it uses non-blocking BIOs. - Davide ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
