Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:

... However, consider the pathological case,
in which an adversary manages to introduce N-1 bits of known state into your
PRNG which has N bits of internal state.  ...

What you seem not to understand from this discussion is that the
internal state is a consequence of input that is processed via
a diffusion mechanism, a cryptographic hash such as SHA1 or MD5
or something stronger.  These change roughly half the bits of
their output when a single input bit is changed.

It is not possible to know the state itself without direct inspection
of structures whose security is obviously essential for useful
random number generation.

If your point is that system events are not a good source of
entropy, I agree.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to