Mr. Michael, I am surprised the rude way u write in a public forum. U don't know how to remain a professional, maintain decency and to disagree with someone, all simultaneously. Dear Moderator, I would suggest to unsubscribe this person from the list.
Michael, u need more training in communication and then probably in technology. Get back to me if u need any help. I can suggest u some good places to school u properly. And, don't be a shameless and start writing here. Others are already laughing at you. --Chaks On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 1:44 PM, David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > David Schwartz wrote: > > > > > No, we count on it [RSA] being (for practical purposes) > > irreversible. That's why you need a different key to decrypt than > > you used to encrypt. If it was reversible, like say DES, you > > could decrypt with the same key you encrypted with by simply > > reversing the process. > > > You are truly clueless. Encryption and decryption make RSA > > reversible. Plonk. > > There are two possibilities: > > 1) You didn't understand what I meant. > > 2) You understood what I meant but chose to pretend you didn't. > > It really looks, at least to me, like '2'. So this is you being rude, not > dumb. > > DS > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List [email protected] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
