On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 10:14 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > > The state of the test-repository is a bit old (approx one year) but > you > may have a look into > git://login.openssl.org/openssl > http://www.openssl.org/gitweb.cgi/ > > When the initial test migrations were performed (2 years ago) I used > cvs2svn-2.1.1 > with some setup in cvs2svn-git.options.
Hm, OK. I'll try that again then. > Since then Geoff Thorpe also worked a bit on some automatic way to > keep the test repo in sync with the CVS repo but all of this is on > hold until the team has come to a final decision... What's to decide? Are there any plans being seriously proposed other than 1) Stay in the 20th century with CVS as we are now. 2) Update to git. Surely nobody's suggesting svn/bzr/hg/arch or any of the other artifacts of the one-version-control-system-per-child craze? -- dwmw2 ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
