From: Richard Levitte <rich...@levitte.org>
> richard> sms> 64 Automatic choice of "64" or "64=ARGV".
> richard> sms> 64=ARGV Manual choice of "64=ARGV".
> richard> sms> 64=NOARGV Manual choice of plain "64".
> richard> sms>
> richard> sms> Easy for the normal victim, flexible enough for the
> perpetrator. Not
> richard> sms> very hard to implement.
> richard>
> richard> I like that idea.
>
> While I do, I'm exhausted. As it stands now, there's just the "64"
> option to choose for 64 bits. It will do exactly what you mention
> above, and it seems to work well together with that changes I made in
> apps/openssl.c.
>
> Have a look at tomorrow's snapshot, please, and see how it works on
> your system. Let's do the rest, like the extra fancy 64-bit options
> another day. (or, well, nothing stops you, of course ;-))
Sounds good to me. Perhaps a little different:
64 Automatic choice of "64" or "64=ARGV".
64=ARGV Manual choice of "64=ARGV".
64= Manual choice of plain "64".
"Why invent a new, nonstandard keyword?", I always say. (If I said that
it would be easy to add, then I don't have a good excuse not to add it.)
> [...] tomorrow's snapshot [...]
Every time I look at the snapshot Web page, I get confused. README
doesn't describe the -VMS_64BIT- or -WIN64- things, for example. Which
"tomorrow's snapshot" would be the right one? (And which "tomorrow"?)
SMS.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
