Hi,


I used a slightly modified script:



if (@ARGV[0]) {

        while(<>) { print "foo".$_; }

} else {

        print "Running on $^O, using: $^X, version $]\n";

        open STDOUT,"| \"$^X\" $0 -";

        print "bar\n";

        close STDOUT;

}



Results (the first sentence is comments of me regarding the used platform, the 
other 2 lines are output of the perl script):



HPUX 11.11 on PA risc: 

Running on hpux, using: perl, version 5.008

foobar



HPUX11.23 on Itanium:

Running on hpux, using: perl, version 5.008009

foobar



Linux Suse SLES 10 SP2, x64:

Running on linux, using: /usr/bin/perl, version 5.008008

foobar



Solaris 10, ultrasparc IIIi:

Running on solaris, using: perl, version 5.008004

foobar



Solaris 10, T200-sparc:

Running on solaris, using: perl, version 5.008004

Foobar



Solaris 9:

Running on solaris, using: perl, version 5.006001

foobar



AIX6.1 (oslevel: 6100-06-07-1207):

Running on aix, using: perl, version 5.008008

foobar



Tru64 V5.1B-5:

Running on dec_osf, using: perl, version 5.008

Foobar



I don’t have Suse SLES 9 and AIX5.3 boxes anymore, but the previous outcome may 
give a fairly confidence that quoting $^X should work (in most cases).

Windows was already tested by me, and also works. I don't know what the lowest 
supported perl version is. You may want to add 5.6.1 or 5.8 as minimum 
requirement?

Solaris 9 is not supported anymore by Oracle. So that system is some ancient 
relict from the past in our hardware farm :-).



Regards,

Kees



-----Original Message-----

From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 18:07

To: Kees Dekker

Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org

Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2835] question/proposal for openssl 1.0.1c to make 
do_ms.bat and do_win64a.bat somewhat more consisent + solve build errors for 
WIN64a.



> It is indeed the quoting of the perl command interpreter issue.

> 

> I also work often on *nix platforms, and tested with \"$^X\", which

> worked. But I can’t guarantee that too for all *nix flavors... It may

> be worth trying it (unless someone else complains). If you are unsure

> for a certain *nix flavor, please let me know. We may have that

> platform in house (currently, our product is built on Suse Linux,

> HPUX (PA-risc + Itanium), Solaris, AIX, Windows. Secondary platforms:

> Tru64. Our product also run on RedHat linux (although we built on

> Suse SLES 10)).



Well, scripts in question are not executed non-x86_64, so that OSes like

AIX, HPUX are irrelevant in the context. I was referring to x86_64 BSDs,

Solaris, MacOS X... And it's not necessarily OS, but Perl version. Even

with Perl it can get bizarre when you least expect it...



Let's put it this way. Even though non-x86_64 platforms are not relevant

in the context, if you can confirm that below script works on all of

your *nix platforms, then I'd be comfortable to propagate \"$^X\". Also

tell what Perl versions do you have.



if (@ARGV[0]) {

        while(<>) { print "foo".$_; }

} else {

        open STDOUT,"| \"$^X\" $0 -";

        print "bar\n";

        close STDOUT;

}





______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to