On 12/20/2013 12:52 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote: > On Fri Dec 20 18:37:18 2013, d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: >> >> I posted a series of 10 changesets to openssl-dev which standardizes >> OpenSSL's input, API, and output on the standard names (DHE and ECDHE) >> while retaining backward compatibility for string input and API for >> the >> older EDH and EECDH terminology. >> > > Could you include the lot in a single attachment using "git format-patch" or > as > a pull request? It's easier to review and apply that way.
Thanks for the quick followup, Stephen.
I can do whatever you think is most useful, but i need a bit more
guidance to be sure i'm giving you what will be most useful for you.
I used "git send-email" to send these patches earlier, which is how it
is usually done on the linux-nfs and notmuch mailing lists (two places i
follow that use git heavily).
I've also made these patches available as the "standardize-on-dhe"
branch at git://lair.fifthhorseman.net/~dkg/openssl -- you can add that
to your local repo with:
git remote add dkg git://lair.fifthhorseman.net/~dkg/openssl
git remote update dkg
and then review it with your local repository browser of choice.
If you want them via format-patch: my understanding is that git
format-patch produces a directory of patches, one per commit. i'm not
sure how you want that as a single attachment. is a tarball of the
directory produced by git format-patch OK, or do you want them squashed
down to a single aggregated patch? I think having the separate patches
makes them easier to review.
let me know what else you'd like me to do.
Regards,
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
