On 9 June 2014 19:42, Kurt Roeckx via RT <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 10:57:57PM +0200, Matt Caswell via RT wrote: >> Hi Quanah >> >> Thanks for the submission. The problem with correcting this is that >> technically >> it forms part of the public API (since the macro is defined in asn1.h). I >> guess >> there's probably not a huge risk in changing it, as I can't imagine there's >> too >> many people relying on that define being there, but then on the other hand as >> this is just a minor cosmetic change its probably not worth it. > > Can I suggest that we have both defines, set to the same value, > for now and at some point remove the other? >
Unfortunately the correctly spelled version already exists in the codebase but defined to a *different* number. Matt ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
