No. What I am saying is that once I created an RPM from the 1.0.0j source package from openssl.org (which includes a .spec file) it doesn't match the list of files that are currently installed on the FC16 system. My concern here is that the list of files is different and installed in different places. This may be something special/peculiar that someone did on FC16. My ultimate goal is to update the currently installed openssl (1.0.0j) on FC16 to 1.0.0m without breaking anything that depends on it. I will try simply removing openssl-1.0.0j-1.i686.rpm that is installed and install the openssl-1.0.0m-1.i686.rpm package version. Following is a detail of the differences that I am describing:
Currently installed file list from FC16 openssl-1.0.0j-1.i686.rpm is the following: /etc/pki/CA /etc/pki/CA/certs /etc/pki/CA/crl /etc/pki/CA/newcerts /etc/pki/CA/private /etc/pki/tls /etc/pki/tls/certs /etc/pki/tls/certs/Makefile /etc/pki/tls/certs/make-dummy-cert /etc/pki/tls/misc /etc/pki/tls/misc/CA /etc/pki/tls/misc/c_hash /etc/pki/tls/misc/c_info /etc/pki/tls/misc/c_issuer /etc/pki/tls/misc/c_name /etc/pki/tls/openssl.cnf /etc/pki/tls/private /lib/.libcrypto.so.1.0.0j.hmac /lib/.libcrypto.so.10.hmac /lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0j /lib/libcrypto.so.10 /usr/bin/openssl /usr/lib/.libssl.so.1.0.0j.hmac /usr/lib/.libssl.so.10.hmac /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0j /usr/lib/libssl.so.10 /usr/lib/openssl /usr/lib/openssl/engines /usr/lib/openssl/engines/lib4758cca.so /usr/lib/openssl/engines/libaep.so /usr/lib/openssl/engines/libatalla.so /usr/lib/openssl/engines/libcapi.so /usr/lib/openssl/engines/libchil.so /usr/lib/openssl/engines/libcswift.so /usr/lib/openssl/engines/libgmp.so /usr/lib/openssl/engines/libnuron.so /usr/lib/openssl/engines/libpadlock.so /usr/lib/openssl/engines/libsureware.so /usr/lib/openssl/engines/libubsec.so /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/CHANGES /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/FAQ /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/INSTALL /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/NEWS /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/README /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/README.FIPS /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/c-indentation.el /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/openssl.txt /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/openssl_button.gif /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/openssl_button.html /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/ssleay.txt /usr/share/man/man1/asn1parse.1ssl.gz . . . <removed list of man pages to make list manageable for this email> /usr/share/man/man7/des_modes.7ssl.gz File list in newly built openssl-1.0.0j-1.i686.rpm from source package (FC16 openssl-1.0.0j.tar.gz) off the openssl.org site. I used the openssl-1.0.0j.spec file provided in the tar file. The openssl-1.0.0m-1.i686.rpm I build has almost identical file list. /usr/bin/c_rehash /usr/bin/openssl /usr/bin/ssleay /usr/lib/libcrypto.so /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib/libssl.so /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0 /usr/man/man1/CA.pl.1ssl.gz . . . <removed list of man pages to make list manageable for this email> /usr/man/man7/des_modes.7ssl.gz /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/CHANGES /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/CHANGES.SSLeay /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/NEWS /usr/share/doc/openssl-1.0.0j/README /var/ssl/certs /var/ssl/misc /var/ssl/misc/CA.pl /var/ssl/misc/CA.sh /var/ssl/misc/c_hash /var/ssl/misc/c_info /var/ssl/misc/c_issuer /var/ssl/misc/c_name /var/ssl/misc/tsget /var/ssl/openssl.cnf /var/ssl/private
