On 1 July 2014 10:50, Ben Laurie <b...@links.org> wrote: > On 1 July 2014 06:52, Zoltan Arpadffy <z...@polarhome.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I see that Rich is doing a fantastic job by cleaning up the backlog... >> I absolutely agree that very old releases cannot be supported, but what >> about the platforms? >> >> I thought until now, that as long there are developers who are willing to >> develop for a certain platform and there is some community interest in using >> that - the platform will be supported as odd might it be in the Windows and >> Linux dominated World. >> >> I just started to wonder, will soon come the time when my patches will be >> also refused with the "unsupported platform" comment? > > Our soon-to-be-released roadmap has this to say on "supported platform": > > * Currency, i.e. a platform is widely deployed and in current use > * Vendor support > * Available to the dev team, i.e. the dev team have access to a > suitable environment in which to test builds and deal with tickets and > issues > * Dev team ownership, i.e. at least one person on the team is willing > to take some responsibility for a platform
The roadmap has now been announced on the -users list: http://marc.info/?l=openssl-users&m=140421380818174&w=2 It is available here: https://www.openssl.org/about/roadmap.html Matt ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
