On 1 July 2014 19:15, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote: >> I was wondering why 'make depend' output was saved in the Makefiles. > > Because way back when (think like early X and xmkmf) that's the way things > were done. > >> So I guess adding the .d files to the repository and using include statements >> in the Makefiles is a reasonable possibility? (That's the angle I'm taking >> with >> my experiment, though I hadn't thought to add the .d's to the repo.) > > Oh gaak, I hope we don't add the .d files and I hope also that there is only > one per directory. But all that's open.
Really? Its much more efficient to update the .d files when you compile the (changed) source - which more-or-less implies one per source file. > > /r$ > > -- > Principal Security Engineer > Akamai Technologies, Cambridge, MA > IM: [email protected]; Twitter: RichSalz ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
