> Really? Its much more efficient to update the .d files when you compile the
> (changed) source - which more-or-less implies one per source file.
Not necessarily. One process scanning all the sources, and one file open/parse
in make is often more efficient.
I read this on the internet somewhere, but I can't find it now, so it MUST be
true :)
/r$
--
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technologies, Cambridge, MA
IM: [email protected]; Twitter: RichSalz
:��I"Ϯ��r�m����
(����Z+�7�zZ)���1���x ��h����W^��^��%�� ��&jם.+-1�ځ��j:+v�������h�
