-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Am 19.07.2014 21:17, schrieb Stephen Henson via RT:
...
> The EC code assumes that parameters are present in several places
> and can't be adjusted to cover absent parameters AFAICS without
> some major changes. A private key without parameters is unusable
> anyway.

Moreover RFC5915 says on p.3:
Though the ASN.1 indicates that the parameters field is OPTIONAL,
implementations that conform to this document MUST always include the
parameters field.

/Ernst.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)

iQEVAwUBU8uAyw4CfLKaaO8dAQjzDAf+KtMFo2pVElXflD24zlRrqyhMtTEU8Wy5
V6Fw8ivEIAUsbMd/9p0Cli1vfMIK0cHH19Xv6HhiHqCkSYNnunBSkRwMD44lU2PD
LW0hQEP5Lvle5ZzCHXXLsEZhZTa74vs+oDZ59TRm4g1Mu+i61tgG0s060ZCm7lMD
OdSUz6peP6K/FYqAHofLkJOcWuv/8NlQtIK3/CrWkbP3COLkMZa6l+UB1E0fITiW
hVmWk///Va71585kk96zDiID6CvdVnn611oc2mvcpz5lJ/e35Bgh5rz60QQ4t4dO
AVez34CVMwvKDYQ/IPROLZSQWsE2vTttkSvydI34XOfy1Bu9V+SgxQ==
=8QXl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to