> So I would not understand that we go in a hurry to remove WCE compatibility
I do not think we are in a hurry to do that. Your patch looks nice. I am CC'ing rt, so that this thread becomes an issue and we'll see the link to your mail. -- Principal Security Engineer Akamai Technologies, Cambridge MA IM: [email protected] Twitter: RichSalz > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-openssl- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Pierre DELAAGE > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 6:05 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: AW: Platform query > > Dear All, > At least for WCE, I can say that with this patch: > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg35958.html > > which is W32 compatible and NOT WCE specific, and consists of only one > typedef (which is highly clarifying the code ALSO for win32) and one CAST > error (cast error that SHOULD be corrected ALSO for win32 platform), > Openssl 1.1.0 master20140721 is perfectly working for WC5/WM6/WM7, and > still compatible with w8 phones and CE SDK 2013 (yes it does exist). > > while, most of the time (and after improvment in the past to switch to > winsock2) , WCE code is just the same as win32 desktop code. > > Yours sincerely > Pierre Delaage > > > > Le 20/08/2014 18:32, [email protected] a écrit : > > And a question concerning a different platform. Is there any interest > > in integrating "official" support for Windows Phone (old win CE "of > > course" is something largely different...)? > > > __________________________________________________________ > ____________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List [email protected] > Automated List Manager [email protected] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
