On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:20 AM, John Foley (foleyj) <fol...@cisco.com>
wrote:

> We've found a way to recreate the scenario using s_client/s_server.  We're
> using the -no_ticket option on the server.  Therefore, the ServerHello
> doesn't contain the session ticket extension.  It also doesn't send the
> NewSessionTicket message.
>
> To summarize the problem, when the client side is using
> SSL_set_session_secret_cb() and including a valid ticket in the ClintHello,
> then the logic in ssl3_get_server_hello() assumes the server is doing
> session resumption.  This puts the client-side state machine into the
> SSL3_ST_CR_FINISHED_A.  However, since the server side is configured to not
> do resumption via the -no_ticket option, the server continues with a normal
> handshake by sending the Certificate message.  The client aborts the
> handshake when it receives the Certificate message while in the
> SSL3_ST_CR_FINISHED_A state.
>
>
> As Erik identified earlier in the thread, the cause of this appears to be
> the addition of setting s->hit in the following code:
>
>     if (s->version >= TLS1_VERSION && s->tls_session_secret_cb) {
>         SSL_CIPHER *pref_cipher = NULL;
>         s->session->master_key_length = sizeof(s->session->master_key);
>         if (s->tls_session_secret_cb(s, s->session->master_key,
>                                      &s->session->master_key_length,
>                                      NULL, &pref_cipher,
>                                      s->tls_session_secret_cb_arg)) {
>             s->session->cipher = pref_cipher ?
>                 pref_cipher : ssl_get_cipher_by_char(s, p + j);
>             s->hit = 1;
>         }
>     }
>
> Why does the client-side now assume the server is doing session resumption
> simply because the session secret callback facility is being used?
>

Because a developer (me) introduced a bug. With OpenSSL client behaviour,
peeking ahead is only required for EAP-FAST. I got rid of the peeking while
tightening up the ChangeCipherSpec handling and in the process, got it
wrong for EAP-FAST. Anyway, apologies, I see the problem and am working on
a patch.

While we're at it, you may be able to help me with the following question:
how should the client handle callback failure? The old code (pre my
refactoring which introduced the bug) did this

#ifndef OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT
        /* check if we want to resume the session based on external
pre-shared secret */
        if (s->version >= TLS1_VERSION && s->tls_session_secret_cb)
                {
                SSL_CIPHER *pref_cipher=NULL;
                s->session->master_key_length=sizeof(s->session->master_key);
                if (s->tls_session_secret_cb(s, s->session->master_key,
                                             &s->session->master_key_length,
                                             NULL, &pref_cipher,
                                             s->tls_session_secret_cb_arg))
                        {
                        s->session->cipher = pref_cipher ?
                                pref_cipher : ssl_get_cipher_by_char(s, p+j);
                        }
                }
#endif /* OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT */

This is surely wrong as it's just ignoring the failure?

Thanks,

Emilia

________________________________________
> From: openssl-dev [openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] on behalf of Dr.
> Stephen Henson [st...@openssl.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 11:49 AM
> To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] s3_clnt.c changes regarding external pre-shared
> secret seem to break EAP-FAST
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015, Erik Tkal wrote:
>
> >
> > If I do not send a sessionID in the clientHello but do send a valid
> > sessionTicket extension, the server goes straight to changeCipherSpec and
> > the client generates an UnexpectedMessage alert.
> >
>
> Does the server send back an empty session ticket extension?
>
> Steve.
> --
> Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
> Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
> _______________________________________________
> openssl-dev mailing list
> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
> _______________________________________________
> openssl-dev mailing list
> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
>
_______________________________________________
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Reply via email to