I was unaware of 2501. But that’s fine by me… however, why hasn’t 2051 been applied to the code? -- -Todd Short // tsh...@akamai.com<mailto:tsh...@akamai.com> // “One if by land, two if by sea, three if by the Internet."
On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com<mailto:qua...@zimbra.com>> wrote: --On Tuesday, March 03, 2015 3:15 PM -0600 "Short, Todd" <tsh...@akamai.com<mailto:tsh...@akamai.com>> wrote: The previous patch file had two bugs due to a swapped argument and the formatting changes (missing braces). The attached is an updated patch. Why did you open a new RT when <http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2051> already exists and has for ages? I would suggest RT3717 be marked as a duplicate of 2051. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Platform Architect Zimbra, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
