--On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 9:29 PM +0000 "Short, Todd" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was unaware of 2501. But that's fine by me… however, why hasn't > 2051 been applied to the code? People have been asking this question for years. https://lwn.net/Articles/486369/ <http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/Openssl-IPv6-Support-td54588.html> Here's an even *older* RT from 2006: <http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1365&user=guest&pass=guest> There's never been any sort of real substantive answer as to why getting IPv6 support in has taken almost a decade, when people have constantly supplied patches for it. Supposedly it was going to go into 1.0.2. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Platform Architect Zimbra, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
