On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 16:23 +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > > > > Hm, that hurts. The UEFI build was using that, as it doesn't > > provide a > > strspn() function. And doesn't need or want this functionality. > > Hm. There's always going to be some extensions that not everyone > wants... No good ideas here.
This one is particularly problematic because we don't have strspn(). If I were to resurrect it as part of the patchset to make the UEFI build work sanely, would you object to that? It's also been suggested that certain things could be elided simply by OPENSSL_SYS_UEFI rather than OPENSSL_NO_xxx. But I really don't like that idea very much. -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
