> If I were to resurrect it as part of the patchset to make the UEFI > build work sanely, would you object to that?
I've got no problem with that. > It's also been suggested that certain things could be elided simply by > OPENSSL_SYS_UEFI rather than OPENSSL_NO_xxx. But I really don't like > that idea very much. We'll have to address these on a case-by-case basis as things come up, I guess. _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
