On Jan 17 18:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 17 17:50, Richard Levitte wrote: > > In message <20160117154353.gc9...@calimero.vinschen.de> on Sun, 17 Jan 2016 > > 16:43:53 +0100, Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com> said: > > > > vinschen> On Jan 17 01:04, Richard Levitte wrote: > > vinschen> > If you have a look in "config", it doesn't generate > > "Cygwin-x86_64" at > > vinschen> > all. Would you be willing to have a look at that script and > > modernise > > vinschen> > it regarding Cygwin? > > vinschen> > > vinschen> Like the attached? > > > > Thank you, that helped... it was less traumatic than I imagined ;-) > > I've attached a small fixup, your thoughts? > > Well, that works, too. But if we ever support another architecture, > we'd have to tweak two files, config and 10-main.conf, rather then just > one, 10-main.conf.
Btw., when calling Configure rather than config, i686 would be simpler
for the package builder since it could just use the build variable
${ARCH}, rather than having to check and explicitely turn this to "x86".
Just saying...
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
